Thursday, December 20, 2012

The Ban on Assault Weapons is a Threat to the Freedom of Religion


Thinking readers well versed in church history understand how a chaplain posits a free democratic society has a Second Amendment right, an obligation, to keep and bear arms and that the reinstitution of the ban on assault weapons is a threat to the freedom of religion.  “Instances of the licentious and outrageous behavior of the military conservators of the peace still multiply upon us” (Townshend Acts).  

In 1972, the Environmental Protection Agency invited psychoanalyst Murray Bowen, M.D. to do a paper on human reaction to environmental problems.  He identified a link between the family and society.  The link had to do, first, with the delinquent teenage youngster, who is a responsibility for both parents and society, and secondly, with changes in the way both the parents and the agents of society deal with the same problem.  We are in a period of increasing chronic societal anxiety. Society responds to this with emotionally determined decisions to allay the anxiety of the moment; this results in symptoms of dysfunction; the efforts to relieve the symptoms result in more emotional Band-Aid legislation, which increased the problem.  We keep repeating the cycle, just as the family goes through similar cycles, regressing to the states we call emotional illness. Modern Americans assert it is more urgent to pass new gun control legislation after a mass shooting of children while simultaneously insisting a woman has the right to kill a child in the womb.  It is irrational to have such incongruent and radically opposing policies within the same society.  A government that fails to hold authorities accountable for Fast and Furious and Benghazi and considers it their responsibility to disarm her citizens is schizophrenic.

ATF "gunwalking" operations were, in part, a response to longstanding criticism of the bureau for focusing on relatively minor gun violations while failing to target high-level gun smuggling figures.  It is one of the many examples of emotional response to societal anxiety and the lack of maturity of both citizens and the political leaders they elect.

42 weapons recovered by Mexican military in Naco, Sonora, Mexico, 20 Nov 2009; these weapons were investigated by U.S. ICE.  Operation Fast and Furious; suspect Uriel Patino bought 19 of the weapons pictured one to two weeks earlier. http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/2012/s1209.pdf


The Second Amendment

As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The concept is an extension of European thought during a period of conflict between Protestants and Catholics.  In an effort to oppress the Protestants, their weapons were confiscated, rendering them defenseless.  When less anxious leaders triumphed, a rational policy was based on six foundational assumptions universally necessary to a free people to maintain a healthy balance between the governed and the government:  

  • deterring tyrannical government;
  • repelling invasion;
  • suppressing insurrection;
  • facilitating a natural right of self-defense;
  • participating in law enforcement;
  • enabling the people to organize a militia system.

 

 

Saturday, December 15, 2012

HAS AMERICA REGRESSED TO AN EMOTIONAL QUASI-INTRAUTERINE STATE?


 

And, the children struggled together within her.  Gen. 25:22 (ASV) 

 

Incessant discussions across all media forms are centered on the perception, the theory really, that Americans have become an entitlement society.  The prevailing concept of the ultraconservative is that barely more than half the nation’s adult population is gainfully employed and forty seven percent of United States households are recipients of government assistance at one level, or multiple levels.  Is this proof of an entitlement society and, if it is, does it indicate an emotionally regressive state as defined by Murray Bowen?  Is it possible that the population as a whole has reached the point one might think of it as symbiotic?  Has our country devolved into something that resembles the governmental womb of peoples so interconnected, adversarial, and dependent that it would be appropriate to apply the analogy of Jacob and Esau in Rebekah’s womb?  As I process the current events, I work within the parameters of biblical teaching and family systems theory.

According to news reports a young adult, twenty years of age, shoots the mother he cohabits with in the face then proceeds to the nearby elementary school and shoots the principle and psychologist after an altercation.  Next, he enters the kindergarten classroom his mother teaches and kills twenty of her students.  The shooter is misidentified initially based upon the fact that he is in possession of his elder brother’s identification.  The tragedy ends with the perpetrators suicide.  Investigators find it remarkable that his home indicates the young man is meticulously keeping his personal space in order.  The parents are divorced.  The father and elder brother reside in a neighboring state.  The shooter is allegedly developmentally impaired.  

Are the cohabitation, impairment, assumption of a brother’s identity, and choice of targets an indication of symbiosis within the family or something else?  Is it possible he feels entitled to kill his mother’s students in retribution for some perceived error committed by his mother?  Alternatively, given the intrafamily dynamic, has he regressed to a nearly nonexistent level of differentiation of self and taken on a misguided persona of an angry brother and killed out of an anxious undifferentiated family ego mass?

 The cyclical nature of the symbiotic relationship between the mother and son is so intertwined that they are emotional Siamese twins, or so distant and hostile that they repel each other.  The symbiotic mother-son relationship is intense, not circumscribed or confined to the two but rather a fragment of the larger emotional field, fluid, and shifting, the family emotional system extending beyond the central family unit to nonrelatives and institutions.  In the undifferentiated emotional unit, one family member accurately knows the thoughts, feelings, fantasies, and dreams of another family member.  This “fusion of selfs” could involve every area of ego functioning.  One ego could function for that of another.   Is it understandable only from the family systems perspective — confusion with or the assumption of the brother’s identity?  Is this another level of entitlement mentality?

A biblical perspective might assume humans in the fallen state inherently possess an entitlement, adversarial worldview.  Therefore, any perceived regression and symbiotic functioning is not confined to the United States of America; it is a function of the common human experience from the beginning of time and must be understood as such.  The answers to the above perplexing questions ultimately exist only within the Creator.   A redeemed people cannot hope to comprehend the extent of our interrelatedness and the repercussions of an all-encompassing unseen warfare between spiritual good and evil.
Twins Fight in Womb (video)